| Pages: [1] |
1. So 20$ for a virtual cloth is called "pricing strategy" nowadays? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Patient 2428190 Originally by: CCCP Supersmug Originally by: Patient 2428190 It costs a lot so it will become an "elite item" for players to have, as supposed to something cheap enough for everybody to purcha...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 22:01:00
|
2. So 20$ for a virtual cloth is called "pricing strategy" nowadays? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Patient 2428190 It costs a lot so it will become an "elite item" for players to have, as supposed to something cheap enough for everybody to purchase. Should they have rolled out more products at more pricepoints? Hell yes....
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 21:50:00
|
3. So 20$ for a virtual cloth is called "pricing strategy" nowadays? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just don't buy anything. CCP has no clue how to price items and if they wanna run a failshop it's up to them.
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 21:40:00
|
4. Name Me One Company - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Most companies would have just issued a statement in about an hour saying 'no plans to add nonvanity items' instead of insulting players. You are right that CCP is the only one who would fly in the player reps and spend 2 days hammering out a bare...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 21:32:00
|
5. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel Originally by: Kitsune Sakai Quote: It is CCPæs plan that the Noble Exchange (NeX store) will be used for the sale of vanity items only. There are no plans, and have been no plans, as per previ...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 18:25:00
|
6. One Question Still: Dock>ShipSpinning>CQ, or Dock>CQ>ShipSpinning? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Apollo Gabriel Why can't ship spinning come back? That is the question, although the real question is why ungoo to pick up ammo or a bookmark? Why not have dock be the EXACT 100% same way as before? then over undock button...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 18:22:00
|
7. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Navigator people want to be able to disable the poorly designed/optimized/spaceship barbie CQ. They do not want to be able to walk down to hanger and just watch their ship spin. Why the hell do you guys even care if people choose to turn it off? S...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 18:15:00
|
8. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Maplestone CCP feels that vanity-only items are going to be important enough to invest time, tears and reputation to push through an item shop. CSM feels vanity items are not important enough to worry about. I find it diff...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 17:59:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: John McCreedy Thank you for this blog and thank you to the CSM for their time and effort put in to this, especially since they had short notice. Thank you also to CCP for listening but we'll be judging you by your actions....
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 17:35:00
|
10. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP is now locking down all threads related to this. Time to silence the community eh ccp? "look no more massive threadnaughts, everyone is happy now" nice try gadaffi
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 17:20:00
|
11. CCP Wrangler proving once again CCP doesn't get it. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Way to try to silence the community. "keep it in that one thread where less people have a chance of seeing it" GEE I WONDER WHY CCP HAS LOST THE COMMUNITYS TRUST AND RESPECT????????????????
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 17:14:00
|
12. BS CCP, "no plans to" != "will not" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vandrion Originally by: CCCP Supersmug To be fair to CCP on this.............if they decided to actually sell a play to win item it would probably take them 24-36 months from now to get it into the game. So 'no plans...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 17:11:00
|
13. the emo vampire fad will be dead and gone.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
yeah, "lets cash in on this vampire craze" wasn't a good idea, ccp took over a week and spent a ton of money to release a sentence of "no plans for non-vanity items" which should have taken about 5 minutes and cost nothing
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 17:04:00
|
14. BS CCP, "no plans to" != "will not" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
To be fair to CCP on this.............if they decided to actually sell a play to win item it would probably take them 24-36 months from now to get it into the game. So 'no plans' currently probably means 2-3 years.
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 16:57:00
|
15. VICTORY - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yes. Soon you'll be able to buy a LED Picture Frame from the NeX store that you can zoom in on. It will show your currently equiped ship spinning. Cost only 750,000 Aurum. HOW MUCH DO YOU LOVE SHIP SPINNING?
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 16:51:00
|
16. New Dev Blog: Accord reached at CCP's special summit - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
lmfao, anyone who buys it was "only intended to debate something" is a ******, do you often disagree with serial killing but then debate its merits? no you don't, you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar CCP, it would have been better to ad...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 16:43:00
|
17. 1600 GMT and STILL no statement - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sorry needs to be localized into 43 languages, 13 of which are no longer used. Also when translating to Danish the message sounded a little smug. We couldn't figure out why until we reread the English and realized it was smug. So we had to start o...
- by CCCP Supersmug - at 2011.07.02 16:39:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |